Judgement Search Cause List Cause List Search Latest Judgements Video Link Roster of Sittings Fortnightly Disposal Report Judiciary Court Administration Federal Judicial Academy Judicature Judicial Commission of Pakistan Judicial System of Pakistan
ConsultaIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ INHERENT JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.8658-8659 OF 2019 The Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Etc.. Appellant(s) Versus Sunil Kumar B
ConsultaSupreme Court of India. M.C. Mehta Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others Etc. Etc on 15 May, 1992. Equivalent citations: 1991 SCR (1) 866, 1991 SCC (2) 353, AIRONLINE
ConsultaCoated cotton denim crusher with embroidered logo on front. $58 Product Images * free shipping on all orders over $250, some exceptions may apply previews lookbook news random about stores sizing f.a.q. contact terms privacy accessibility mailing list
ConsultaJUDGEMENT The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : (i) “Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order or Direction commanding and compelling the 2nd respondent to issue license to the petitioner to operate crusher unit notwithstanding the erroneous mentioning made in Exhibit-P3 and P5 with respect to the crusher unit;
ConsultaIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.1627-1628 of 2022 (@ Diary No.19961 of 2020) Binay Kumar Dalei & Ors.. Appellant(s) Versus State of Odisha & Ors.. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T
Consultathe two stone crushers alleging unbearable sufferings due to noise and air pollution emanating from those units. A complaint, in this regard was also filed on 10th November,
ConsultaMumbai on August 5. 1999. in Appeal No. 253/98 partly allowing the appeal filed by M/s. Thakur Stone Crusher and others-respondents No. 1 and 2 herein, which was filed by the respondents against an order passed by Debts Recovery Tribunal. Jaipur, on
Consulta2022-03-13T19:03:20+00:00 State of Uttarakhand Vs Kumaon Stone Crusher Latest All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01072004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit
ConsultaThe petitioner started stone crusher and erected some structures in the land in dispute and started using it for industrial purpose without obtaining the permission of the authorities. Vide Award dated 31.1.1979 the Land Acquisition Officer Jaipur acquired an area of 5 Bighas and 7 Biswas out of the total area of 6 Bighas and 2 Biswas of Khasra No. 715/4.
ConsultaE N T M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatis. and order dated 20.07.2021 passed by the High Court of. Karnataka in Regular First Appeal No. 100200/2015, by. which the High Court has allowed the said appeal. preferred by respondent Nos. 3
ConsultaSupreme®/The North Face® Trekking Crusher. 669. 196. Release: 9th June 22 (Week 16) Season: spring-summer 2022. Water resistant recycled nylon crusher with shockcord closure. Utility webbing band around brim. Embroidered logos on webbing at front and back. Made exclusively for Supreme.
Consulta11 · Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business. More than half the world’s population sees AP journalism every day. Read the latest U.S. Supreme Court news, from cases and rulings to new nominees and
ConsultaSearch on Supreme Today AI joint property family court husband wife source of income 138 case source of income 138 n i act case Jambulingeshwara Stone Crushing Industries VS State of Karnataka 28 Feb 13 India-Karnataka A. B. Reshmi VS 11 Dec 12
ConsultaIt is an admitted fact that the petitioners in all the writ petitions have not complied with the conditions as were imposed at the time of issuing consent to establish and consent to
ConsultaAppellant(s) vs Himachal Road Transport Corporation Retired Employees Union ..Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T. R.SUBHASH REDDY,J. 1. This appeal is filed by the Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another, aggrieved by the judgment and Order dated 08.01.2009, passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, at Shimla in CWP No.
ConsultaJ U D G M E N T . Dr Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J. This judgment has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis: The Appeal. Eco-sensitive Zone
ConsultaRelated Judgements 1. Global Stone Crusher VS State of J&K-02 Feb 17 India-J&K Administrative Law Licensing and Permits 2. LAXMAN PRASAD VS UNION OF INDIA-08 Jan 14 India-Allahabad Administrative Law Licensing 3. Electrosteel Steels Ltd
ConsultaJUDGMENT : 1. The petitioners have filed these petitions seeking, inter alia, following directions: (i) A direction to the respondents to allow them to procure raw material from lessees of the Geology and Mining Department; (ii) A direction to the authorities of Power
ConsultaM/S Shree Maruthi Stone Crushers vs State Of Karnataka on 9 September, 2020. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy.
ConsultaT.S.THAKUR , R.BANUMATHI , UDAY UMESH LALIT STATE OF UTTARANCHAL– Appellant Versus KUMAON STONE CRUSHER – Respondent Decided On : 2016
ConsultaThe Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision to strike down the Fourth and Fifth Amendment Rules. The Court directed the State to recover transit fees at the rate stipulated in the Fifth Amendment.
ConsultaThe Supreme Court allowed the appeals and found the transit fee under Rule 5 to be regulatory, stating that it was not necessary for the State to establish quid pro quo. The
ConsultaStanding, from left to right: Justices Neil M. Gorsuch, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Brett M. Kavanaugh. Wikimedia Commons. Here are 20 of the most impactful historic judgments made by the United States
ConsultaThe transit fee under Rule 5 was found to be regulatory, and the State was not required to establish quid pro quo for the levy of transit fee. ORDER : 1. In State of U.P. and Others Versus Sitapur Packing Wood Suppliers and Others reported in (2002) 4 SCC 566, validity of levy of transit fee under Rule 5 of the UP Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce
Consulta2. That the appellant as distribution licensee filed a petition before the State Commission for MYT approval for FY 2014-2015, provisional truing up of ARR for FY 2015-2016 and Multi Year Tariff for 3rd Control Period FY 2016-2017 to FY 2019-2020. The said petition
ConsultaTrituradora de piedra vendida por proveedores certificados, como trituradoras de mandíbula/cono/impacto/móvil, etc.
OBTENER COTIZACIÓN